229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.07%
Revenue growth below 50% of SONO's 32.73%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-0.48%
Cost reduction while SONO shows 33.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
12.73%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SONO's 31.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.36%
Margin expansion while SONO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
20.79%
R&D growth while SONO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-120.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
2.54%
Operating expenses growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.35%
Total costs growth less than half of SONO's 8.32%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-20.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
18.18%
D&A growth while SONO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
1200.00%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x SONO's 93.33%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1042.64%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x SONO's 94.97%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
715.38%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x SONO's 95.22%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
697.03%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x SONO's 96.40%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-20.00%
Other expenses reduction while SONO shows 2.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
40.32%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of SONO's 98.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
36.14%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of SONO's 98.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
36.84%
Tax expense growth while SONO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
41.86%
Net income growth below 50% of SONO's 95.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
37.63%
Net margin growth below 50% of SONO's 96.37%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
40.91%
EPS growth below 50% of SONO's 94.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
36.36%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of SONO's 94.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.78%
Share count reduction below 50% of SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.73%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
