229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.69%
Revenue decline while SONO shows 32.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-2.69%
Cost reduction while SONO shows 33.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
0.69%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SONO's 31.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.43%
Margin expansion while SONO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.92%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-300.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-4.71%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-3.25%
Total costs reduction while SONO shows 8.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-50.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
15.38%
D&A growth while SONO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.69%
EBITDA growth below 50% of SONO's 93.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.24%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of SONO's 94.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.00%
Operating income growth below 50% of SONO's 95.22%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.90%
Operating margin growth below 50% of SONO's 96.40%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-26.79%
Other expenses reduction while SONO shows 2.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.05%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of SONO's 98.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.91%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of SONO's 98.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.69%
Tax expense growth while SONO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.20%
Net income growth below 50% of SONO's 95.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.06%
Net margin growth below 50% of SONO's 96.37%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.68%
EPS growth below 50% of SONO's 94.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.33%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of SONO's 94.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.59%
Share count reduction below 50% of SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-2.25%
Diluted share reduction while SONO shows 0.42% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
