229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.41%
Revenue decline while SONO shows 32.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.42%
Cost reduction while SONO shows 33.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-4.40%
Gross profit decline while SONO shows 31.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.01%
Margin expansion while SONO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.50%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-400.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-0.79%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-3.48%
Total costs reduction while SONO shows 8.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-33.33%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-3.45%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-20.69%
EBITDA decline while SONO shows 93.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.03%
EBITDA margin decline while SONO shows 94.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.31%
Operating income decline while SONO shows 95.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.05%
Operating margin decline while SONO shows 96.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.70%
Other expenses reduction while SONO shows 2.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-29.09%
Pre-tax income decline while SONO shows 98.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.82%
Pre-tax margin decline while SONO shows 98.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-53.33%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-20.00%
Net income decline while SONO shows 95.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.31%
Net margin decline while SONO shows 96.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.00%
EPS decline while SONO shows 94.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.00%
Diluted EPS decline while SONO shows 94.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.82%
Share count reduction below 50% of SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.25%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
