229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.20%
Revenue growth below 50% of SONO's 32.73%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-0.84%
Cost reduction while SONO shows 33.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
2.96%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SONO's 31.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.75%
Margin expansion while SONO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.65%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-0.24%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-0.67%
Total costs reduction while SONO shows 8.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.25%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
100.00%
Similar EBITDA growth to SONO's 93.33%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-8.35%
EBITDA margin decline while SONO shows 94.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.76%
Operating income decline while SONO shows 95.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.94%
Operating margin decline while SONO shows 96.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.69%
Other expenses reduction while SONO shows 2.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
337.50%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x SONO's 98.63%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
337.02%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x SONO's 98.96%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
350.00%
Tax expense growth while SONO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
333.33%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x SONO's 95.18%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
332.86%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x SONO's 96.37%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
333.33%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x SONO's 94.83%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
333.33%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x SONO's 94.83%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.40%
Share count reduction below 50% of SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.89%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
