229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.75%
Revenue growth below 50% of SONO's 32.73%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
5.68%
Cost growth less than half of SONO's 33.45%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
2.39%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SONO's 31.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.25%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.84%
R&D growth while SONO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.00%
Other expenses growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.07%
Total costs growth less than half of SONO's 8.32%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.33%
D&A growth while SONO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.00%
EBITDA growth below 50% of SONO's 93.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.56%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of SONO's 94.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
53.33%
Operating income growth 50-75% of SONO's 95.22%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
46.39%
Operating margin growth below 50% of SONO's 96.40%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-26.09%
Other expenses reduction while SONO shows 2.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
36.84%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of SONO's 98.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
30.64%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of SONO's 98.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
40.00%
Tax expense growth while SONO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
35.71%
Net income growth below 50% of SONO's 95.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
29.57%
Net margin growth below 50% of SONO's 96.37%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
28.57%
EPS growth below 50% of SONO's 94.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
28.57%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of SONO's 94.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.08%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SONO's 0.42%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.42%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
