229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.00%
Revenue growth below 50% of SONO's 32.73%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
12.71%
Cost growth less than half of SONO's 33.45%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
6.54%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SONO's 31.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.50%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.43%
Operating expenses growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.64%
Total costs growth 1.1-1.25x SONO's 8.32%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.48%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
48.08%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of SONO's 93.33%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
5.10%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of SONO's 94.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
86.96%
Similar operating income growth to SONO's 95.22%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
68.42%
Operating margin growth 50-75% of SONO's 96.40%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
41.18%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SONO's 2.87%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
111.54%
Pre-tax income growth 1.25-1.5x SONO's 98.63%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
90.57%
Similar pre-tax margin growth to SONO's 98.96%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
100.00%
Tax expense growth while SONO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
131.58%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x SONO's 95.18%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
108.62%
Net margin growth 1.25-1.5x SONO's 96.37%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
144.44%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x SONO's 94.83%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
133.33%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x SONO's 94.83%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
0.39%
Share count reduction below 50% of SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.78%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
