229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.84%
Revenue decline while SONO shows 32.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-6.19%
Cost reduction while SONO shows 33.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-1.12%
Gross profit decline while SONO shows 31.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
3.90%
Margin expansion while SONO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.36%
R&D growth while SONO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.33%
Other expenses growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.30%
Operating expenses growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.40%
Total costs reduction while SONO shows 8.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-50.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
9.09%
D&A growth while SONO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-19.67%
EBITDA decline while SONO shows 93.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.15%
EBITDA margin decline while SONO shows 94.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.35%
Operating income growth below 50% of SONO's 95.22%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.50%
Operating margin growth below 50% of SONO's 96.40%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-184.62%
Other expenses reduction while SONO shows 2.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-26.44%
Pre-tax income decline while SONO shows 98.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.70%
Pre-tax margin decline while SONO shows 98.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.00%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-26.98%
Net income decline while SONO shows 95.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.27%
Net margin decline while SONO shows 96.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.03%
EPS decline while SONO shows 94.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.67%
Diluted EPS decline while SONO shows 94.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.80%
Share count reduction below 50% of SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.59%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
