229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.50%
Revenue growth below 50% of SONO's 32.73%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
5.51%
Cost growth less than half of SONO's 33.45%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
5.47%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SONO's 31.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.03%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.63%
R&D growth while SONO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
2.35%
Operating expenses growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.71%
Total costs growth 50-75% of SONO's 8.32%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
600.00%
Interest expense growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
13.89%
D&A growth while SONO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
23.47%
EBITDA growth below 50% of SONO's 93.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.57%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of SONO's 94.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.00%
Operating income decline while SONO shows 95.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.00%
Operating margin decline while SONO shows 96.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
218.18%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SONO's 2.87%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
32.81%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of SONO's 98.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
25.89%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of SONO's 98.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
33.33%
Tax expense growth while SONO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
32.61%
Net income growth below 50% of SONO's 95.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
25.70%
Net margin growth below 50% of SONO's 96.37%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
31.82%
EPS growth below 50% of SONO's 94.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
27.27%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of SONO's 94.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.65%
Share count reduction below 50% of SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
3.80%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
