229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-24.18%
Revenue decline while SONO shows 32.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-26.83%
Cost reduction while SONO shows 33.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-17.07%
Gross profit decline while SONO shows 31.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
9.37%
Margin expansion while SONO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.30%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-57.14%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-5.65%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-23.38%
Total costs reduction while SONO shows 8.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.85%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-29.47%
EBITDA decline while SONO shows 93.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.78%
EBITDA margin decline while SONO shows 94.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.73%
Operating income decline while SONO shows 95.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
21.69%
Operating margin growth below 50% of SONO's 96.40%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.17%
Other expenses reduction while SONO shows 2.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-27.20%
Pre-tax income decline while SONO shows 98.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.98%
Pre-tax margin decline while SONO shows 98.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.69%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-27.43%
Net income decline while SONO shows 95.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.29%
Net margin decline while SONO shows 96.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.40%
EPS decline while SONO shows 94.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-27.71%
Diluted EPS decline while SONO shows 94.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.22%
Share count reduction below 50% of SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.50%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
