229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.69%
Revenue growth below 50% of SONO's 32.73%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
12.48%
Cost growth less than half of SONO's 33.45%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
6.57%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SONO's 31.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.72%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.29%
R&D growth while SONO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
5.93%
Operating expenses growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.17%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x SONO's 8.32%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.79%
D&A growth while SONO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
83.57%
Similar EBITDA growth to SONO's 93.33%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
50.67%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of SONO's 94.97%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-15.90%
Operating income decline while SONO shows 95.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.02%
Operating margin decline while SONO shows 96.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
18.95%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SONO's 2.87%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
9.08%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of SONO's 98.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.45%
Pre-tax margin decline while SONO shows 98.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.29%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
14.83%
Net income growth below 50% of SONO's 95.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.74%
Net margin growth below 50% of SONO's 96.37%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.65%
EPS growth below 50% of SONO's 94.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.58%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of SONO's 94.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.30%
Share count reduction below 50% of SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.32%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
