229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.71%
Revenue decline while SONO shows 32.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-21.75%
Cost reduction while SONO shows 33.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-15.88%
Gross profit decline while SONO shows 31.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
4.77%
Margin expansion while SONO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.27%
R&D growth while SONO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.13%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-7.25%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-19.21%
Total costs reduction while SONO shows 8.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.86%
D&A growth while SONO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-19.48%
EBITDA decline while SONO shows 93.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.28%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of SONO's 94.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-21.59%
Operating income decline while SONO shows 95.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.34%
Operating margin decline while SONO shows 96.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-60.13%
Other expenses reduction while SONO shows 2.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-24.26%
Pre-tax income decline while SONO shows 98.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.66%
Pre-tax margin decline while SONO shows 98.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.68%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-24.92%
Net income decline while SONO shows 95.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.49%
Net margin decline while SONO shows 96.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.12%
EPS decline while SONO shows 94.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.00%
Diluted EPS decline while SONO shows 94.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.23%
Share count reduction below 50% of SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.17%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SONO's 0.42%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
