229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.13%
Revenue growth below 50% of SONO's 32.73%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
2.35%
Cost growth less than half of SONO's 33.45%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
1.75%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SONO's 31.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.37%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.90%
R&D growth while SONO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.76%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
3.60%
Operating expenses growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.60%
Total costs growth less than half of SONO's 8.32%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.33%
D&A growth while SONO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-9.08%
EBITDA decline while SONO shows 93.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.98%
EBITDA margin decline while SONO shows 94.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.30%
Operating income growth below 50% of SONO's 95.22%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.79%
Operating margin decline while SONO shows 96.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.76%
Other expenses reduction while SONO shows 2.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.12%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of SONO's 98.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.97%
Pre-tax margin decline while SONO shows 98.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.19%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
1.99%
Net income growth below 50% of SONO's 95.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.14%
Net margin decline while SONO shows 96.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.66%
EPS growth below 50% of SONO's 94.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.26%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of SONO's 94.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.28%
Share count reduction below 50% of SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.68%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
