229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
18.39%
Revenue growth 50-75% of SONO's 32.73%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
17.73%
Cost growth 50-75% of SONO's 33.45%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
19.55%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of SONO's 31.79%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
0.98%
Margin expansion while SONO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.99%
R&D growth while SONO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-703.33%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
5.18%
Operating expenses growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.18%
Total costs growth above 1.5x SONO's 8.32%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.93%
D&A growth while SONO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
42.94%
EBITDA growth below 50% of SONO's 93.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.74%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of SONO's 94.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
31.16%
Operating income growth below 50% of SONO's 95.22%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.79%
Operating margin growth below 50% of SONO's 96.40%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-25.00%
Other expenses reduction while SONO shows 2.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
29.21%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of SONO's 98.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.15%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of SONO's 98.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.92%
Tax expense growth while SONO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
35.48%
Net income growth below 50% of SONO's 95.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.43%
Net margin growth below 50% of SONO's 96.37%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
34.83%
EPS growth below 50% of SONO's 94.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
34.58%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of SONO's 94.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.48%
Share count reduction below 50% of SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.57%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
