229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-13.93%
Revenue decline while SONO shows 32.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-15.08%
Cost reduction while SONO shows 33.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-12.26%
Gross profit decline while SONO shows 31.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.94%
Margin expansion while SONO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
7.04%
R&D growth while SONO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.52%
Other expenses growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.37%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-13.12%
Total costs reduction while SONO shows 8.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.35%
D&A growth while SONO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-19.36%
EBITDA decline while SONO shows 93.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.31%
EBITDA margin decline while SONO shows 94.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.79%
Operating income decline while SONO shows 95.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.16%
Operating margin decline while SONO shows 96.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
51.52%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SONO's 2.87%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-15.32%
Pre-tax income decline while SONO shows 98.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.62%
Pre-tax margin decline while SONO shows 98.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.80%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-9.00%
Net income decline while SONO shows 95.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.72%
Net margin growth below 50% of SONO's 96.37%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-7.69%
EPS decline while SONO shows 94.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.69%
Diluted EPS decline while SONO shows 94.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.44%
Share count reduction below 50% of SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.34%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
