229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.30%
Revenue growth below 50% of SONO's 32.73%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
21.46%
Cost growth 50-75% of SONO's 33.45%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
9.08%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SONO's 31.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.21%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8.92%
R&D growth while SONO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.00%
Other expenses growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.55%
Operating expenses growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.44%
Total costs growth above 1.5x SONO's 8.32%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.39%
D&A growth while SONO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
13.27%
EBITDA growth below 50% of SONO's 93.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.61%
EBITDA margin decline while SONO shows 94.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.41%
Operating income growth below 50% of SONO's 95.22%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-8.51%
Operating margin decline while SONO shows 96.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
16.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SONO's 2.87%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
6.53%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of SONO's 98.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-8.41%
Pre-tax margin decline while SONO shows 98.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.80%
Tax expense growth while SONO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.82%
Net income growth below 50% of SONO's 95.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-9.01%
Net margin decline while SONO shows 96.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.33%
EPS growth below 50% of SONO's 94.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.33%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of SONO's 94.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.51%
Share count reduction below 50% of SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.49%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
