229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
29.57%
Similar revenue growth to SONO's 32.73%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
34.16%
Similar cost growth to SONO's 33.45%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
22.43%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of SONO's 31.79%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-5.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.47%
R&D growth while SONO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-612.07%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
8.57%
Operating expenses growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
29.91%
Total costs growth above 1.5x SONO's 8.32%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.51%
D&A growth while SONO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
28.16%
EBITDA growth below 50% of SONO's 93.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.09%
EBITDA margin decline while SONO shows 94.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
28.65%
Operating income growth below 50% of SONO's 95.22%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.71%
Operating margin decline while SONO shows 96.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
23817.24%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SONO's 2.87%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
27.24%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of SONO's 98.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.80%
Pre-tax margin decline while SONO shows 98.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
10.97%
Tax expense growth while SONO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
32.43%
Net income growth below 50% of SONO's 95.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.21%
Net margin growth below 50% of SONO's 96.37%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
30.77%
EPS growth below 50% of SONO's 94.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
30.77%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of SONO's 94.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.26%
Share count reduction below 50% of SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.16%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SONO's 0.42%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
