229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-15.43%
Revenue decline while SONO shows 32.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-19.54%
Cost reduction while SONO shows 33.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-10.33%
Gross profit decline while SONO shows 31.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
6.02%
Margin expansion while SONO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.95%
R&D growth while SONO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.48%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-5.44%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-17.90%
Total costs reduction while SONO shows 8.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.64%
D&A growth while SONO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-14.82%
EBITDA decline while SONO shows 93.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.56%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of SONO's 94.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-11.28%
Operating income decline while SONO shows 95.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.90%
Operating margin growth below 50% of SONO's 96.40%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.03%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SONO's 2.87%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-11.13%
Pre-tax income decline while SONO shows 98.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.08%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of SONO's 98.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-11.40%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-11.04%
Net income decline while SONO shows 95.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.19%
Net margin growth below 50% of SONO's 96.37%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-12.00%
EPS decline while SONO shows 94.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.00%
Diluted EPS decline while SONO shows 94.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.27%
Share count reduction below 50% of SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.35%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
