229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.69%
Revenue growth below 50% of SONO's 32.73%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
7.67%
Cost growth less than half of SONO's 33.45%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-3.95%
Gross profit decline while SONO shows 31.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-6.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.42%
R&D growth while SONO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9225.00%
Other expenses growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.72%
Operating expenses growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-24.34%
Total costs reduction while SONO shows 8.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.49%
D&A growth while SONO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.07%
EBITDA decline while SONO shows 93.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.41%
EBITDA margin decline while SONO shows 94.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.44%
Operating income decline while SONO shows 95.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.91%
Operating margin decline while SONO shows 96.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-117.71%
Other expenses reduction while SONO shows 2.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.16%
Pre-tax income decline while SONO shows 98.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.57%
Pre-tax margin decline while SONO shows 98.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.08%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-6.81%
Net income decline while SONO shows 95.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.25%
Net margin decline while SONO shows 96.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.82%
EPS decline while SONO shows 94.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.06%
Diluted EPS decline while SONO shows 94.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.19%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SONO's 0.42%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.12%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SONO's 0.42%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
