229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
51.57%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x SONO's 32.73%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
55.12%
Cost growth above 1.5x SONO's 33.45%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
46.24%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x SONO's 31.79%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-3.51%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
11.48%
R&D growth while SONO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while SONO shows 4.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while SONO shows 1.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-111.23%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-0.34%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
110.00%
Total costs growth above 1.5x SONO's 8.32%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
61.88%
D&A growth while SONO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
61.51%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of SONO's 93.33%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
4.00%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of SONO's 94.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
57.26%
Operating income growth 50-75% of SONO's 95.22%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
3.75%
Operating margin growth below 50% of SONO's 96.40%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1005.88%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SONO's 2.87%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
62.23%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of SONO's 98.63%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
7.04%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of SONO's 98.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
72.06%
Tax expense growth while SONO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
59.04%
Net income growth 50-75% of SONO's 95.18%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
4.93%
Net margin growth below 50% of SONO's 96.37%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
61.29%
EPS growth 50-75% of SONO's 94.83%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
58.06%
Diluted EPS growth 50-75% of SONO's 94.83%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
0.06%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SONO's 0.42%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.10%
Diluted share reduction while SONO shows 0.42% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
