229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-22.24%
Revenue decline while SONO shows 32.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-23.42%
Cost reduction while SONO shows 33.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-20.46%
Gross profit decline while SONO shows 31.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
2.29%
Margin expansion while SONO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.21%
R&D growth while SONO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.98%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-4.17%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-21.20%
Total costs reduction while SONO shows 8.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
24.43%
Interest expense growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.73%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-22.61%
EBITDA decline while SONO shows 93.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.48%
EBITDA margin decline while SONO shows 94.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.61%
Operating income decline while SONO shows 95.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.06%
Operating margin decline while SONO shows 96.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
68.24%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SONO's 2.87%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-23.97%
Pre-tax income decline while SONO shows 98.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.23%
Pre-tax margin decline while SONO shows 98.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.86%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-24.72%
Net income decline while SONO shows 95.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.19%
Net margin decline while SONO shows 96.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.38%
EPS decline while SONO shows 94.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.68%
Diluted EPS decline while SONO shows 94.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.84%
Share count reduction while SONO shows 0.42% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.80%
Diluted share reduction while SONO shows 0.42% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
