229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-14.49%
Revenue decline while SONO shows 32.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-12.90%
Cost reduction while SONO shows 33.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-16.80%
Gross profit decline while SONO shows 31.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.71%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.05%
R&D growth while SONO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.57%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
3.02%
Operating expenses growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-10.66%
Total costs reduction while SONO shows 8.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
23.31%
Interest expense growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
24.41%
D&A growth while SONO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-17.30%
EBITDA decline while SONO shows 93.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.28%
EBITDA margin decline while SONO shows 94.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.95%
Operating income decline while SONO shows 95.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.90%
Operating margin decline while SONO shows 96.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
36.36%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SONO's 2.87%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-22.04%
Pre-tax income decline while SONO shows 98.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.83%
Pre-tax margin decline while SONO shows 98.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.00%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-21.31%
Net income decline while SONO shows 95.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.98%
Net margin decline while SONO shows 96.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.34%
EPS decline while SONO shows 94.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.69%
Diluted EPS decline while SONO shows 94.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.10%
Share count reduction while SONO shows 0.42% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.06%
Diluted share reduction while SONO shows 0.42% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
