229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.82%
Revenue growth below 50% of SONO's 32.73%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
3.44%
Cost growth less than half of SONO's 33.45%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
4.41%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SONO's 31.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.56%
Margin expansion while SONO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
9.14%
R&D growth while SONO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.86%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
5.21%
Operating expenses growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.73%
Total costs growth less than half of SONO's 8.32%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
18.41%
Interest expense growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.13%
D&A growth while SONO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.35%
EBITDA growth below 50% of SONO's 93.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.46%
EBITDA margin decline while SONO shows 94.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.83%
Operating income growth below 50% of SONO's 95.22%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.01%
Operating margin growth below 50% of SONO's 96.40%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
12.56%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SONO's 2.87%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
4.07%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of SONO's 98.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.24%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of SONO's 98.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.74%
Tax expense growth while SONO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.19%
Net income growth below 50% of SONO's 95.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.35%
Net margin growth below 50% of SONO's 96.37%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.26%
EPS growth below 50% of SONO's 94.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.52%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of SONO's 94.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.45%
Share count reduction while SONO shows 0.42% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.57%
Diluted share reduction while SONO shows 0.42% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
