229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-30.76%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-30.65%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-30.93%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.25%
Margin decline while SONO shows 4.12% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.85%
R&D reduction while SONO shows 5.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1255.26%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SONO's 351.45%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
4.83%
Operating expenses growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-26.30%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
7.90%
Interest expense growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.22%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-35.79%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.27%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-39.51%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-63.76%
Other expenses reduction while SONO shows 416.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-40.18%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-66.32%
Tax expense reduction while SONO shows 1778.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-31.11%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-29.59%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-29.90%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.72%
Share count reduction while SONO shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.73%
Diluted share reduction while SONO shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
