229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-12.88%
Revenue decline while SONO shows 11.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-12.92%
Cost reduction while SONO shows 7.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-12.81%
Gross profit decline while SONO shows 17.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.07%
Margin expansion below 50% of SONO's 5.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.56%
R&D growth above 1.5x SONO's 0.59%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-122.78%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-3.24%
Operating expenses reduction while SONO shows 1.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-11.23%
Total costs reduction while SONO shows 4.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
6.82%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x SONO's 2.86%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-2.70%
D&A reduction while SONO shows 4.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-18.01%
EBITDA decline while SONO shows 27.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.89%
EBITDA margin decline while SONO shows 35.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.65%
Operating income decline while SONO shows 35.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.92%
Operating margin decline while SONO shows 42.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
145.26%
Other expenses growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-17.84%
Pre-tax income decline while SONO shows 17.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.69%
Pre-tax margin decline while SONO shows 25.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.77%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-16.66%
Net income decline while SONO shows 17.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.35%
Net margin decline while SONO shows 25.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.49%
EPS decline while SONO shows 25.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.71%
Diluted EPS decline while SONO shows 12.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.84%
Share count reduction while SONO shows 7.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.80%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
