229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
18.09%
Revenue growth 50-75% of SONO's 30.97%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
18.18%
Cost growth less than half of SONO's 38.75%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
17.94%
Similar gross profit growth to SONO's 21.77%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-0.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.32%
R&D growth less than half of SONO's 6.93%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
240.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SONO's 77.38%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
5.15%
Operating expenses growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.71%
Similar total costs growth to SONO's 18.57%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
2.60%
Similar interest expense growth to SONO's 2.51%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
3.34%
D&A growth less than half of SONO's 9.74%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
23.53%
EBITDA growth below 50% of SONO's 164.45%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.61%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of SONO's 149.21%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
27.80%
Operating income growth below 50% of SONO's 100.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.22%
Operating margin growth below 50% of SONO's 100.71%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-54.91%
Other expenses reduction while SONO shows 59.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
23.61%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of SONO's 93.24%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.68%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of SONO's 94.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
30.08%
Tax expense growth while SONO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
22.62%
Net income growth below 50% of SONO's 93.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.84%
Net margin growth below 50% of SONO's 95.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
25.42%
EPS growth below 50% of SONO's 93.52%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
25.86%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of SONO's 93.52%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.65%
Share count reduction while SONO shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.60%
Diluted share reduction while SONO shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
