229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-31.19%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-30.77%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-31.88%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.00%
Margin decline while SONO shows 9.34% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.18%
R&D growth less than half of SONO's 8.05%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.02%
Similar other expenses growth to SONO's 82.25%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
-1.94%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-26.72%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
13.48%
Interest expense growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-10.46%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-38.47%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-42.54%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.49%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-32.50%
Other expenses reduction while SONO shows 97.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-42.30%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.15%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-43.36%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-42.09%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.85%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-40.95%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-41.90%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.30%
Share count reduction while SONO shows 2.18% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.52%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
