229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.25%
Revenue decline while SONO shows 23.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-7.22%
Cost reduction while SONO shows 19.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-7.30%
Gross profit decline while SONO shows 29.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.06%
Margin decline while SONO shows 4.89% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
7.83%
R&D growth 50-75% of SONO's 10.67%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-43.33%
Other expenses reduction while SONO shows 250.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
3.15%
Operating expenses growth less than half of SONO's 16.82%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-5.27%
Total costs reduction while SONO shows 18.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-14.26%
Interest expense reduction while SONO shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.52%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-12.02%
EBITDA decline while SONO shows 66.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.14%
EBITDA margin decline while SONO shows 69.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.53%
Operating income decline while SONO shows 34.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.62%
Operating margin decline while SONO shows 46.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.91%
Other expenses reduction while SONO shows 1992.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-13.64%
Pre-tax income decline while SONO shows 42.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.89%
Pre-tax margin decline while SONO shows 53.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.35%
Tax expense reduction while SONO shows 491.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-13.12%
Net income decline while SONO shows 38.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.33%
Net margin decline while SONO shows 50.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.29%
EPS decline while SONO shows 40.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.84%
Diluted EPS decline while SONO shows 40.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.21%
Share count reduction while SONO shows 3.12% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.11%
Diluted share reduction while SONO shows 3.12% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
