229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
19.01%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x SONO's 13.09%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
18.30%
Similar cost growth to SONO's 19.01%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
20.20%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x SONO's 5.88%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.00%
Margin expansion while SONO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.45%
R&D reduction while SONO shows 11.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-379.07%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-1.83%
Operating expenses reduction while SONO shows 12.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
14.18%
Similar total costs growth to SONO's 15.93%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-6.47%
Interest expense reduction while SONO shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.39%
D&A growth 1.1-1.25x SONO's 6.79%. Bill Ackman would demand investment justification.
29.89%
EBITDA growth while SONO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.14%
EBITDA margin growth while SONO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
31.66%
Operating income growth while SONO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.62%
Operating margin growth while SONO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
36.78%
Other expenses growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
35.40%
Pre-tax income growth while SONO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.77%
Pre-tax margin growth while SONO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.74%
Tax expense growth while SONO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
36.26%
Net income growth while SONO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.49%
Net margin growth while SONO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
38.18%
EPS growth while SONO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
38.18%
Diluted EPS growth while SONO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.75%
Share count reduction while SONO shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.76%
Diluted share reduction while SONO shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
