229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-36.49%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-36.50%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-36.48%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.02%
Margin expansion below 50% of SONO's 2.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.56%
R&D growth while SONO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
111.24%
Other expenses growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.33%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-31.27%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-3.57%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-1.07%
D&A reduction while SONO shows 6.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-44.90%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.25%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-49.73%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.85%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.20%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-49.32%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.20%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-48.78%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-49.41%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.34%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-49.21%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-48.80%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.24%
Share count reduction while SONO shows 0.01% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.12%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
