229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.35%
Revenue growth below 50% of SONO's 42.38%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
2.95%
Cost growth less than half of SONO's 36.66%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
1.39%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SONO's 50.38%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.94%
Margin decline while SONO shows 5.62% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
4.23%
R&D growth less than half of SONO's 16.49%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1480.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SONO's 125.65%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
2.31%
Operating expenses growth less than half of SONO's 32.08%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
2.82%
Total costs growth less than half of SONO's 34.13%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-7.93%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-1.22%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1.30%
EBITDA growth while SONO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.02%
EBITDA margin decline while SONO shows 24.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.85%
Operating income growth while SONO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.49%
Operating margin decline while SONO shows 24.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-83.69%
Other expenses reduction while SONO shows 109.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.02%
Pre-tax income growth while SONO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.28%
Pre-tax margin decline while SONO shows 26.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.11%
Tax expense reduction while SONO shows 108.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.04%
Net income growth while SONO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.26%
Net margin decline while SONO shows 23.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.56%
EPS growth while SONO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.56%
Diluted EPS growth while SONO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.09%
Share count reduction while SONO shows 0.44% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.13%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
