229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.40%
Revenue growth below 50% of SONO's 36.31%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
8.12%
Cost growth less than half of SONO's 27.80%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
8.86%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SONO's 47.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.42%
Margin expansion below 50% of SONO's 7.94%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.62%
R&D growth while SONO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-94.94%
Other expenses reduction while SONO shows 796.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
1.80%
Operating expenses growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.80%
Total costs growth 1.1-1.25x SONO's 5.94%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
-9.04%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-1.82%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
10.31%
EBITDA growth below 50% of SONO's 157.72%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.77%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of SONO's 142.34%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
12.86%
Operating income growth below 50% of SONO's 127.11%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.12%
Operating margin growth below 50% of SONO's 119.89%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
173.91%
Other expenses growth less than half of SONO's 3408.14%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
13.43%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of SONO's 132.46%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.64%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of SONO's 123.81%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
18.26%
Tax expense growth while SONO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
12.62%
Net income growth below 50% of SONO's 132.31%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.89%
Net margin growth below 50% of SONO's 123.70%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.85%
EPS growth below 50% of SONO's 130.77%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
12.31%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of SONO's 130.77%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.12%
Share count reduction while SONO shows 1.62% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.93%
Diluted share reduction while SONO shows 5.60% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
