229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-9.10%
Revenue decline while SONO shows 13.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-10.34%
Cost reduction while SONO shows 20.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-7.42%
Gross profit decline while SONO shows 7.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.85%
Margin expansion while SONO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
8.65%
R&D growth while SONO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.91%
Other expenses growth less than half of SONO's 226.62%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
8.15%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x SONO's 5.05%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-7.31%
Total costs reduction while SONO shows 12.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.75%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1.25%
D&A growth less than half of SONO's 3.68%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-11.03%
EBITDA decline while SONO shows 31.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.13%
EBITDA margin decline while SONO shows 24.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.28%
Operating income decline while SONO shows 34.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.50%
Operating margin decline while SONO shows 18.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-52.17%
Other expenses reduction while SONO shows 213.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-13.00%
Pre-tax income decline while SONO shows 74.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.30%
Pre-tax margin decline while SONO shows 53.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-40.08%
Tax expense reduction while SONO shows 113.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.98%
Net income decline while SONO shows 3.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.23%
Net margin growth while SONO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-7.09%
EPS decline while SONO shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.14%
Diluted EPS decline while SONO shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.74%
Share count reduction while SONO shows 2.67% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.87%
Diluted share reduction while SONO shows 0.79% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
