229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-21.52%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-21.50%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-21.54%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.03%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.28%
R&D growth less than half of SONO's 5.90%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-174.38%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-4.08%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-18.77%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-0.43%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1.48%
D&A growth less than half of SONO's 3.88%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-25.96%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.74%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.93%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
164.78%
Other expenses growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-26.92%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.89%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.42%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-27.78%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.98%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.01%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.62%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.69%
Share count reduction while SONO shows 9.38% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.70%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
