229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-14.72%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-13.97%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-15.68%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.13%
Margin decline while SONO shows 5.62% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
6.42%
R&D growth while SONO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
108.61%
Other expenses growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.16%
Operating expenses growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-10.80%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
4.05%
Interest expense growth less than half of SONO's 117.78%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
2.48%
D&A growth while SONO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-20.89%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.24%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.03%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.74%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-106.25%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-23.47%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-29.34%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-22.26%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.85%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.08%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.05%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.71%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.86%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
