229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-13.75%
Revenue decline while SONO shows 22.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-14.14%
Cost reduction while SONO shows 16.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-13.25%
Gross profit decline while SONO shows 30.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.58%
Margin expansion below 50% of SONO's 6.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.20%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
485.94%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SONO's 150.28%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
0.50%
Operating expenses growth less than half of SONO's 2.21%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-11.15%
Total costs reduction while SONO shows 9.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
7.31%
Interest expense growth less than half of SONO's 80.26%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
5.31%
D&A growth 1.25-1.5x SONO's 4.23%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize asset base.
-16.55%
EBITDA decline while SONO shows 88.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.25%
EBITDA margin decline while SONO shows 90.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.79%
Operating income decline while SONO shows 62.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.84%
Operating margin decline while SONO shows 69.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-514.06%
Other expenses reduction while SONO shows 1697.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-19.90%
Pre-tax income decline while SONO shows 68.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.14%
Pre-tax margin decline while SONO shows 74.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-32.45%
Tax expense reduction while SONO shows 122.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-17.71%
Net income decline while SONO shows 23.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.59%
Net margin decline while SONO shows 37.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.99%
EPS decline while SONO shows 25.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.11%
Diluted EPS decline while SONO shows 25.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.57%
Share count reduction while SONO shows 0.28% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.45%
Diluted share reduction while SONO shows 0.28% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
