229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.41%
Positive growth while SONO shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
8.12%
Cost increase while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
11.02%
Positive growth while SONO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.47%
Margin expansion while SONO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.81%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-119.03%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-1.84%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
5.82%
Total costs growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.40%
Interest expense growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-13.07%
D&A reduction while SONO shows 13.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
13.71%
EBITDA growth while SONO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.93%
EBITDA margin growth while SONO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.27%
Operating income growth while SONO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.18%
Operating margin growth while SONO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
110.94%
Other expenses growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
18.76%
Pre-tax income growth while SONO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.54%
Pre-tax margin growth while SONO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
41.73%
Tax expense growth while SONO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.47%
Net income growth while SONO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.53%
Net margin growth while SONO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.75%
EPS growth while SONO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.87%
Diluted EPS growth while SONO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.63%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.65%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
