229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
33.61%
Revenue growth below 50% of SONO's 100.84%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
31.89%
Cost growth less than half of SONO's 86.45%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
35.69%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SONO's 120.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.56%
Margin expansion below 50% of SONO's 9.91%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.32%
R&D growth less than half of SONO's 20.94%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Other expenses growth less than half of SONO's 253.43%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
8.36%
Operating expenses growth less than half of SONO's 29.62%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
26.84%
Total costs growth less than half of SONO's 59.79%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
7.35%
D&A growth while SONO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
45.91%
EBITDA growth below 50% of SONO's 667.73%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.21%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of SONO's 284.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
49.70%
Operating income growth below 50% of SONO's 381.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
12.05%
Operating margin growth below 50% of SONO's 239.91%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-272.41%
Other expenses reduction while SONO shows 416.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
49.36%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of SONO's 385.57%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.79%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of SONO's 242.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
58.51%
Tax expense growth less than half of SONO's 1018.22%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
47.74%
Net income growth below 50% of SONO's 359.12%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.58%
Net margin growth below 50% of SONO's 229.02%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
48.98%
EPS growth below 50% of SONO's 360.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
49.32%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of SONO's 356.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.57%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.61%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
