229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-24.10%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-25.09%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-22.94%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.53%
Margin expansion while SONO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.69%
R&D growth above 1.5x SONO's 1.37%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.20%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-20.89%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.42%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-28.89%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.30%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.89%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.95%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
416.00%
Other expenses growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-30.42%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.32%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.98%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-30.31%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.14%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-29.82%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.67%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.72%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
