229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.48%
Revenue decline while SONO shows 57.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.92%
Cost reduction while SONO shows 46.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-6.13%
Gross profit decline while SONO shows 71.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.69%
Margin decline while SONO shows 8.82% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.30%
R&D growth while SONO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.80%
Operating expenses growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.62%
Total costs reduction while SONO shows 19.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.49%
D&A growth less than half of SONO's 7.03%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-8.24%
EBITDA decline while SONO shows 141.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.92%
EBITDA margin decline while SONO shows 127.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.13%
Operating income decline while SONO shows 118.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.86%
Operating margin decline while SONO shows 111.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.13%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-9.14%
Pre-tax income decline while SONO shows 117.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.87%
Pre-tax margin decline while SONO shows 111.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.50%
Tax expense reduction while SONO shows 1303.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-9.26%
Net income decline while SONO shows 105.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.99%
Net margin decline while SONO shows 103.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.50%
EPS decline while SONO shows 105.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.50%
Diluted EPS decline while SONO shows 105.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.56%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.75%
Diluted share reduction while SONO shows 2.82% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
