229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.67%
Positive growth while SONO shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.74%
Cost increase while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
10.59%
Positive growth while SONO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.01%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.27%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
8.13%
Total costs growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.14%
D&A growth less than half of SONO's 43.14%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
15.25%
EBITDA growth while SONO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.14%
EBITDA margin growth while SONO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.72%
Operating income growth while SONO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.47%
Operating margin growth while SONO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-86.62%
Other expenses reduction while SONO shows 11905.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
16.14%
Pre-tax income growth while SONO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.95%
Pre-tax margin growth while SONO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
267.62%
Tax expense growth while SONO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-31.29%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-37.92%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.71%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.71%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.97%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.69%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
