229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-30.59%
Revenue decline while SONY shows 30.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-2.51%
Cost reduction while SONY shows 25.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-188.63%
Gross profit decline while SONY shows 43.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-227.69%
Margin decline while SONY shows 9.85% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.96%
R&D reduction while SONY shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
300.00%
Other expenses change of 300.00% while SONY maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-6.73%
Operating expenses reduction while SONY shows 27.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.28%
Total costs reduction while SONY shows 25.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-23.53%
Interest expense reduction while SONY shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.52%
D&A growth less than half of SONY's 252.33%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-1106.49%
EBITDA decline while SONY shows 1213.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2063.46%
EBITDA margin decline while SONY shows 1405.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-893.28%
Operating income decline while SONY shows 289.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1331.05%
Operating margin decline while SONY shows 198.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-977.98%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1453.08%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-987.50%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-972.46%
Net income decline while SONY shows 16.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1445.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-968.00%
EPS decline while SONY shows 6.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-968.00%
Diluted EPS decline while SONY shows 6.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.54%
Share count change of 0.54% while SONY is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.54%
Diluted share change of 0.54% while SONY is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
