229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-46.15%
Revenue decline while SONY shows 9.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-26.73%
Cost reduction while SONY shows 2.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-104.50%
Gross profit decline while SONY shows 36.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-108.35%
Margin decline while SONY shows 24.71% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.99%
R&D change of 0.99% while SONY maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
700.00%
Other expenses change of 700.00% while SONY maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
4.18%
Operating expenses growth less than half of SONY's 8.63%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-20.10%
Total costs reduction while SONY shows 4.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.67%
Interest expense reduction while SONY shows 439.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
33.33%
D&A growth less than half of SONY's 2718.17%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-205.14%
EBITDA decline while SONY shows 415.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-471.40%
EBITDA margin decline while SONY shows 387.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-391.67%
Operating income decline while SONY shows 153.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-641.63%
Operating margin decline while SONY shows 148.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.79%
Other expenses reduction while SONY shows 147.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-228.82%
Pre-tax income decline while SONY shows 151.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-339.22%
Pre-tax margin decline while SONY shows 147.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-249.15%
Tax expense reduction while SONY shows 189.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-221.76%
Net income decline while SONY shows 132.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-326.12%
Net margin decline while SONY shows 129.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-218.28%
EPS decline while SONY shows 129.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-230.95%
Diluted EPS decline while SONY shows 127.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.12%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SONY's 10.62%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-6.73%
Diluted share reduction while SONY shows 20.35% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
