229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.69%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-2.69%
Cost reduction while SONY shows 2.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
0.69%
Positive growth while SONY shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.43%
Margin expansion while SONY shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.92%
R&D reduction while SONY shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-300.00%
Other expenses reduction while SONY shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-4.71%
Operating expenses reduction while SONY shows 12.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.25%
Total costs reduction while SONY shows 4.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-50.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
15.38%
D&A growth 50-75% of SONY's 24.95%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
7.69%
EBITDA growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.24%
EBITDA margin growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.00%
Operating income growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.90%
Operating margin growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-26.79%
Other expenses reduction while SONY shows 274.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.05%
Pre-tax income growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.91%
Pre-tax margin growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.69%
Tax expense growth while SONY reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.20%
Net income growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.06%
Net margin growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.68%
EPS growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.33%
Diluted EPS growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.59%
Share count change of 0.59% while SONY is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
-2.25%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
