229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.20%
Revenue growth below 50% of SONY's 3.22%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-0.84%
Cost reduction while SONY shows 14.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
2.96%
Positive growth while SONY shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.75%
Margin expansion while SONY shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.65%
R&D reduction while SONY shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-0.24%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-0.67%
Total costs reduction while SONY shows 3.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.25%
D&A reduction while SONY shows 6.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
100.00%
EBITDA growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-8.35%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.76%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.94%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.69%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
337.50%
Pre-tax income growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
337.02%
Pre-tax margin growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
350.00%
Tax expense growth while SONY reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
333.33%
Net income growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
332.86%
Net margin growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
333.33%
EPS growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
333.33%
Diluted EPS growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.40%
Share count reduction below 50% of SONY's 0.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.89%
Diluted share increase while SONY reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
