229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.00%
Positive growth while SONY shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
12.71%
Cost increase while SONY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
6.54%
Positive growth while SONY shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.50%
R&D reduction while SONY shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.43%
Operating expenses growth less than half of SONY's 6.63%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
9.64%
Total costs growth while SONY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.48%
D&A reduction while SONY shows 4.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
48.08%
EBITDA growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.10%
EBITDA margin growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
86.96%
Operating income growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
68.42%
Operating margin growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
41.18%
Other expenses growth while SONY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
111.54%
Pre-tax income growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
90.57%
Pre-tax margin growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
Tax expense growth while SONY reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
131.58%
Net income growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
108.62%
Net margin growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
144.44%
EPS growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
133.33%
Diluted EPS growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.39%
Share count change of 0.39% while SONY is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.78%
Diluted share increase while SONY reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
