229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.68%
Positive growth while SONY shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
17.94%
Cost increase while SONY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
13.42%
Positive growth while SONY shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-2.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.40%
R&D reduction while SONY shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.67%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of SONY's 113.03%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
4.59%
Similar operating expenses growth to SONY's 5.08%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
14.63%
Total costs growth while SONY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-28.57%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.44%
D&A reduction while SONY shows 11.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
54.55%
EBITDA growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.72%
EBITDA margin growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
77.78%
Operating income growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
52.36%
Operating margin growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
46.15%
Other expenses growth less than half of SONY's 1776.88%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
72.94%
Pre-tax income growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
48.21%
Pre-tax margin growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
70.83%
Tax expense growth while SONY reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
73.77%
Net income growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
48.93%
Net margin growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
68.97%
EPS growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
67.86%
Diluted EPS growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.27%
Share count increase while SONY reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.35%
Diluted share increase while SONY reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
