229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.69%
Positive growth while SONY shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
12.48%
Cost increase while SONY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
6.57%
Positive growth while SONY shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.72%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.29%
R&D change of 2.29% while SONY maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.00%
Other expenses reduction while SONY shows 583.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
5.93%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x SONY's 2.47%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
11.17%
Total costs growth while SONY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.79%
D&A growth less than half of SONY's 105.06%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
83.57%
EBITDA growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.67%
EBITDA margin growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-15.90%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
18.95%
Other expenses growth while SONY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.08%
Pre-tax income growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.29%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
14.83%
Net income growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.74%
Net margin growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.65%
EPS growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.58%
Diluted EPS growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.30%
Share count change of 0.30% while SONY is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.32%
Diluted share increase while SONY reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
