229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.71%
Revenue decline while SONY shows 4.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-21.75%
Cost reduction while SONY shows 10.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-15.88%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.77%
Margin expansion while SONY shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.27%
R&D change of 1.27% while SONY maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.13%
Other expenses reduction while SONY shows 223.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-7.25%
Operating expenses reduction while SONY shows 1.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-19.21%
Total costs reduction while SONY shows 7.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.86%
Similar D&A growth to SONY's 9.71%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
-19.48%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.28%
EBITDA margin growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-21.59%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.34%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-60.13%
Other expenses reduction while SONY shows 64.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-24.26%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.68%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-24.92%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.49%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.12%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.23%
Share count reduction below 50% of SONY's 0.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.17%
Diluted share increase while SONY reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
