229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.13%
Revenue growth below 50% of SONY's 4.36%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
2.35%
Cost growth 50-75% of SONY's 3.64%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
1.75%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SONY's 6.31%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.37%
Margin decline while SONY shows 1.87% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
6.90%
R&D change of 6.90% while SONY maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.76%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
3.60%
Operating expenses growth while SONY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.60%
Total costs growth while SONY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.33%
D&A growth while SONY reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-9.08%
EBITDA decline while SONY shows 68.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.98%
EBITDA margin decline while SONY shows 61.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.30%
Operating income growth below 50% of SONY's 239.52%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.79%
Operating margin decline while SONY shows 233.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.76%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.12%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of SONY's 808.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.97%
Pre-tax margin decline while SONY shows 770.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.19%
Tax expense reduction while SONY shows 823.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.99%
Net income growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.66%
EPS growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.26%
Diluted EPS growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.28%
Share count reduction below 50% of SONY's 0.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.68%
Diluted share increase while SONY reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
