229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
18.39%
Positive growth while SONY shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
17.73%
Cost increase while SONY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
19.55%
Positive growth while SONY shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.98%
Margin expansion while SONY shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.99%
R&D change of 4.99% while SONY maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-703.33%
Other expenses reduction while SONY shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
5.18%
Operating expenses growth while SONY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.18%
Total costs growth while SONY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.93%
D&A growth less than half of SONY's 599.56%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
42.94%
EBITDA growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.74%
EBITDA margin growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
31.16%
Operating income growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.79%
Operating margin growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-25.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
29.21%
Pre-tax income growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.15%
Pre-tax margin growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.92%
Tax expense growth while SONY reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
35.48%
Net income growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.43%
Net margin growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
34.83%
EPS growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
34.58%
Diluted EPS growth while SONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.48%
Share count change of 0.48% while SONY is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.57%
Diluted share increase while SONY reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
